Services

Engagements with declared scope, named deliverables, and acceptance criteria.

Every engagement starts with a technical diagnostic — not a proposal of hours. The diagnostic is a closed, paid project with a defined deliverable. When it indicates the project should not be done, we say so before any larger commitment.

Four engagements

Each service declares what it delivers, how it executes, and where it ends.

None of the four starts with an allocation of hours: each starts with a diagnostic under closed scope. What changes between them is the object of the decision — cloud foundation, integration layer, data, or agent containment — and the deliverable that stays with the client team at the end.

  • Diagnostic
  • Design

Cloud Architecture and Landing Zone

Azure cloud foundation designed for auditability, before the first production workload. Includes identity, network, policy, data territory, and cost attribution.

Deliverables

Subscription design and governance

Subscription hierarchy, management groups, and resource ownership per workload.

Network and segmentation

Network topology with security perimeter, hybrid connectivity, and egress policy.

Identity and RBAC by design

Least-privilege identity model from day one, including workload identity for services.

Policy and guardrails

Azure Policy and initiatives for automated compliance, no manual procedures.

Method

Every design choice is recorded as an ADR (Architecture Decision Record). Deliverables include operations runbooks for the most sensitive decisions.

  • Diagnostic
  • Implementation

Systems Integration and API Management

Governed integration layer with versioned contracts and end-to-end observability — so failure shows up before the customer complains. Where there is no migration plan, we design the platform without downtime.

Deliverables

API catalog and contracts

Every interface with quota policy, versioning, and authentication documented in OpenAPI.

Messaging and resilience patterns

Queues, topics, and retry with idempotency for async flows that cannot lose messages.

End-to-end observability

Distributed tracing across systems with business-impact alerts, not infrastructure metrics.

Zero-downtime migration

Strangler fig pattern for replacing legacy integration without affecting operations.

Method

Load validation before cutover. Every migration starts with a fortnight of mirrored traffic so differences show up in a report, not an incident.

  • Diagnostic
  • Assessment

Data and AI Readiness

Before buying a model, verify that the data supports the answer. We assess lineage, quality, classification, and access — and tell you when the foundation is not ready.

Deliverables

Source inventory and lineage

Which systems provide data, through which path, with which latency. The dependency map before the pipeline.

Quality criteria with owners

Every data domain with quality metrics and a named responsible party — no owner, no governance.

Classification and access control

Sensitive data mapped with access policy per layer (Bronze/Silver/Gold) and access justification.

Readiness report

What would block an AI pilot today — and the shortest path to unblocking it.

Method

The report separates technical blockers from governance blockers. The first has a timeline; the second needs a decision.

  • Design
  • Implementation

AI Agent Containment and Governance

The pilot becomes production only when the limits are known: scope, authority, audit trail, emergency brake, and incident response. Without a tested kill switch, it does not reach production.

Deliverables

Agent scope and authority

Definition of what the agent can do, with which tools, and under which conditions. Unplanned action = denied action.

Kill switch and rollback

Tested emergency stop mechanism with documented rollback procedure and target containment time.

Audit trail

Every agent action with identity, timestamp, data read, and decision — readable by auditors and legal teams.

LGPD and applicable regime analysis

Use case analysis against applicable law: legal basis, personal data, data subject rights, and controller liability.

Method

The containment design is tested against failure scenarios before the agent touches production. The first kill switch is manual; the second is automated.

No service applies outside context. Let us discover yours.

Thirty minutes to describe the symptom and leave with the initial technical hypothesis and what would need to be measured to confirm it.

No form in this first version: a form here would mean processing personal data without a declared legal basis. Direct channel, with a reply within one business day.